Manchester United’s decision to end Alex Ferguson’s £2m a year ambassadorial role has stirred mixed reactions, especially given the club’s current financial belt-tightening.
Ferguson, a legend at United, had been earning a hefty sum for representing the club since his retirement in 2013.
However, with United recently making 250 staff redundant to save £10m annually, paying Ferguson nearly £200,000 a month for what is essentially a ceremonial role started to look excessive.
Also Read Our Article On “Ten Hag faults Manchester United’s “complacent” attitude“
Critics, including former players like Eric Cantona, expressed their outrage, with Cantona claiming Ferguson should be able to do anything at the club for life.
While Ferguson’s contributions to United are undisputed, the optics of receiving such a significant salary while lower-income employees were being let go felt uncomfortable for many.
Ferguson, once an ardent trade unionist, didn’t make a public fuss about the decision, but the situation raises questions about whether he considered stepping back earlier.
While his legacy remains secure, the timing of his removal comes as United struggles with mediocrity on the field and behind the scenes. In the end, this move seems more about financial necessity than disrespect.
